Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Leica Rumors is reporting a rumor that they picked up which says that the camera that Leica will introduce on May 10th, 2012 will actually contain a black & white sensor! It is widely anticipated that the announcement on the 10th will actually be about the successor to the M9 camera and will likely be called the Leica M10. So does it make sense for Leica to release a camera that is only capable of taking photographs in B&W? And, as also rumored, with no LCD screen on the back of the camera?

So what is a B&W sensor anyway?

All digital image sensors actually only record the amount of light falling on each pixel (actually, the correct term is sensel but we’ll use pixel because that is the most common usage). In other words, the sensor records the luminosity of the light falling on each pixel.

So, how do we then get a color image from these sensors? Actually, the camera plays a little trick. Covering the sensor is a layer that is called the Color Filter Array (CFA) which has the same number and size of pixels as on the sensor. As the name indicates, this layer “filters” the light that reaches the pixel underneath it. The most common arrangement of the CFA is the Bayer pattern named after its inventor, Dr. Bryce Bayer of Kodak, who first proposed the system. In this pattern, each 2×2 block of pixels has one Red, one Blue and two Green filters. The reason it has 2 green filters is due to the way the human eye perceives color where the eye is more sensitive to the green part of the visible spectrum. So, what the sensor is actually recording is the amount of red, blue and green light falling on each pixel. The processor in the camera then does fancy mathematics with this information to determine the color represented by each pixel using an algorithmic computation known as demosaicing.

In a B&W sensor, this color filter array does not exist. Therefore, each pixel is recording the intensity of the light falling on it and any information related to the color of this light is completely lost. The camera electronics then convert this recorded intensity into various shades of gray and it does not need to use any fancy algorithmic tricks in order to do so.

Now that we have that out of the way, the big question arises in my mind is why would Leica want to do such a thing in the M10? A B&W image can be easily acquired from the current cameras by manipulating the RAW image in a processing software like Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop, etc. Why then the need to capture only light intensity in the camera and throw away the color information?

To me, this makes no sense at all. Unless Leica want to release a special edition of the M9, this decision, if true, would be a major strategic blunder for the camera maker! Add to this the lack of an LCD screen on the back and I start to wonder what the Leica designers and engineers are smoking…

Quite honestly, I do not believe that Leica would do such a thing. Sure, they might release a limited production run of the M9 with a monochromatic sensor, but they will not release this as their only M-series camera. Doing so would certainly be shooting themselves in the foot and I doubt if Blackstone would be willing to let their investment go down the drain quickly.

Leica needs to grow their market share in order to remain a viable entity. In order to do so, they need to attract more mainstream photographers – people that want a Leica M-series camera, but need more improvements to it over the current M9. The market for a B&W only Leica M, I fear, is seriously limited to a few photographers and catering to such few numbers does not make sound business sense for a company that has less than 1% of the market in digital cameras – no matter how famous that brand is.

Let’s see what the next few weeks bring – I will be following this story and hopefully, there will be more believable leaks in the days leading up to May 10th. Stay tuned…

Steve Huff is reporting that Leica will hold an event on the 10-11th May 2012 in Berlin and will announce important new products! Could it be that Leica are getting ready to announce the successor to both the M9 and the X1? I guess the next few weeks will tell – I, for one, just can’t wait Smile

The Imaging Resource has just released a number of images shot with a pre-production Canon EOS 5D Mark III. These images are of their still-life set which is shot under controlled lighting for all cameras, not just the 5D3. This makes it easier to compare images with other cameras.

Looking at the 5D3 images and comparing with the 5D2, a couple of things jump right out:

  • At ISO 6400, the 5D3 most definitely exhibits visibly lower noise – both in light and dark areas of the image
  • Also at ISO 6400, the amount of detail in the red swatches is amazing compared to the 5D2!

Most digital cameras have a tough time maintaining detail in red areas under high ISO. That the Mark III does so convincingly over the Mark II speaks volumes about the improvements! At ISO 12800, its basically a no contest! The Mark III has just lost a slight bit of detail in the red, but is still streets ahead of the Mark II which has become mush!

However, the lighter red swatch of cloth is where this camera is definitely struggling at high ISO with the details – it appears to be largely mush!

Another comparison with the EOS 7D is again a no contest. The 5D Mark III is leagues better.

A comparison with the Nikon D4 shows similar noise performance at 6400 for both cameras, but the Nikon maintains a lot more detail in the red cloth and the patterns can be clearly seen. At 12800, the D4 has a very slight advantage in noise, but more of an advantage in the retention of details. Keep in mind thought that the D4 is significantly more expensive.

As a lark, I compared the $8000 Leica M9 with the 5D Mark III. Not a very fair comparison, but interesting nonetheless! Since the Leica only goes up to ISO 2500, I kept the 5D to 3200 and below. Looking at the ISO 1600 shots, there does not appear to be much to pick between the two. What is definitely amazing is that the Leica has more or less the same level of noise, but has significantly more detail even though it has lost a lot of the pattern in the lighter red fabric. This is probably a testament to the Leica optics coupled with the lack of an AA filter on the sensor. The ISO 2500 shot from the M9 is comparable to the ISO3200 shot on the 5D with the exception of the patterns on one of the red fabrics. Looks like a common theme with this particular fabric – all the cameras lose the details on this first!

The bottom line:

I have not had the opportunity of using the 5D Mark III. I can only offer an armchair analysis of photographs taken and posted by another. But looking at these photos, I think the Mark III is an extremely good performer! It’s high ISO performance will delight those that need it. Keep one thing in mind though: These images are shot under ideal, controlled light conditions. Real life situation is often much more difficult. It is one thing to shoot in a studio at high ISO and review the images, and quite another thing to shoot under a real low light situation! Trust me, I’ve been there.

Earlier this morning, Canon announced the successor to the EOS 5D Mark II. Imaginatively called the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, this new camera will not be replacing the venerable Mark II. Instead, it will sit alongside (and slightly above) the older generation camera (which by the way, is still an excellent camera!).

The EOS 5D Mark III will be available in late March for a list price of $3500 and should be cheaper on the street – though not by much. Most of the specs were leaked earlier, but for what it’s worth, here’s a recap:

  • 22.3 MP Full-frame sensor
  • ISO 100-25600 native; L1 of ISO 50; H1:51200 and H2:102,400
  • 3.2 inch rear LCD with 1,040,000 dots (fixed; no tilt/swivel)
  • Digic 5+ processor
  • 61-pt AF Sensor (slightly modified from 1DX)
  • Dual Card (One CF + One SD)
  • 100% Optical TTL viewfinder
  • 6 FPS
  • 1080p Video at 24/25/30p
  • MOV and H.264 format video
  • Video limited to ISO 12,800

Also released, was a new Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT flash.

The internet is all abuzz with some folks lambasting Canon for the low rez sensor, and others just loving the new camera. Shows that there is no pleasing some people!

I have spent the day reviewing the Canon posted sample photos (some posted below) and am impressed with the quality of the images. Keep in mind though that these all appear to be JPEG images straight from the camera and in real life, most of us would do our own post processing with the RAW files.

01_cinc_big

This shot, at ISO 200, shows very good resolution with excellent color rendition.

 

 

 

 

 

06_cinc_big

At ISO 1600, this shot shows a bit of chroma noise in the sky areas, but nothing distracting and eminently useable!

 

 

 

 

16_cinc_big

With this shot at ISO6400, I think it is really great! If this is the out of camera JPEG, I think with a RAW file this would come out even better. I think NR is cranked up really high on this, so you are starting to lose details, but still eminently useable at 1920×1280 resolution.

 

 

11_cinc_big

Now this one at ISO 25600 really shows you how much improved the sensor is over the 5DII! At 100% you can see the details are being wiped out by NR, but if one were to process from RAW, you could easily end up with a very useable 1920×1280 image!

 

 

I think the noise performance of the 5DIII is at least 1 stop better than the 5DII and one would be very happy with this camera.

Personally, I am not planning on upgrading since my 5DII is more than enough for my needs. I can take it easily to 6400 and even have useable shots at 12800. In any case, I prefer to use fast primes and shoot wide open most of the times.

Drop me a line and let me know what you think about the 5DIII? Are you happy with it, or are you planning on moving on to the Nikon D800?

Looks like tomorrow, 2nd March 2012, is the day for the launch of the successor to the Canon EOS 5D Mk II. There was some initial confusion as to the name of the new camera, but it appears that Canon has settled on calling it the Canon EOS 5D Mark III. However, at this point, it may still be conjecture even though there are photographs floating around on the internet of the said camera. Head over to canonrumors.com to take a look at some of these photos including photographs of the launch event in Shanghai.

The specs are rumored to be:

  • 22 MP FF Sensor
  • ISO sensitivity of 100-25600 (Native)
  • 61pt AF borrowed from the 1D X (possibly dumbed down slightly)
  • Dual CF + SD card slots
  • 100% VF coverage

Also due for a release tomorrow is a new flagship Speedlight – possibly 590EX or 600EX.

With the specifications above, if true, it is clear that the 5D Mark III is an evolutionary update to the Mark II rather than a revolutionary update. I am sure a lot of users will be upset at the lower resolution relative to the Nikon D800, and will consider a move over to the Nikon camp. I am also sure that users like me that have no need for ultra-high resolution will stay within the Canon camp. I have never really understood people that jump camera systems (or at least threaten to), but then, each to his own!

What do you think? Will you jump ship or stay? And does Canon have a high-MP camera around the corner as a surprise second announcement?

Canon today announced the release of firmware updates for the EOS 5D Mark II and the EOS 50D cameras. These firmware updates, 2.1.2 for the 5D and 1.0.9 for the 50D can be considered to be minor updates. For both cameras, the firmware update introduces support for the newly released UDMA-7 compatible CF cards released in February 2012 and later. In addition, the 50D firmware update also includes minor corrections to the Dutch language menu.

I am sure that in addition to what has been described in the release notes, there are other defect fixes in there as well. Anyway, you can download these updates from the links below:

Enjoy the new firmware updates if you have (or are looking to) purchased the new UDMA-7 CF cards…

Word on the internet is the Canon EOS 5D Mark II replacement will be launched on February 27th/28th!!! While the exact name of the new camera is unknown, it will either be the EOS 5D Mark III or EOS 5DX. The rumors related to a split in the 5D line seems to have died down as well. It may well turn out that Canon will only launch one high end EOS FF DSLR in the next few days. The rumored specs are:

  • 22MP full-frame CMOS sensor
  • 100% viewfinder coverage
  • 61pt AF borrowed from the EOS 1DX
  • 3.2inch LCD (non-tilt)
  • Dual card slot; 1CF + 1SD
  • Native ISO range of ISO100-25600
  • Priced at $3500

If these specs are true, I say “bring it on”! Even though the price is a tad bit higher compared to the just announced Nikon D800, I think most people would love a new 5D with these specs. More so if the ISO and DR show a noticeable improvement over the Mark II.

Of course, there will be some photographers that will not be pleased by these specs. These are the ones that need ultra-high resolution in their cameras, mostly landscape and fashion photographers. Who knows, maybe Canon will indeed launch two new 5D DLSRs…

The next few days will be very interesting as more becomes known about Canon’s plans…stay tuned!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.